The Scientific Committee is made up of researchers who are highly recognized by the scientific community and who represent all disciplines likely to be interested in the field of organizational behavior. The members of the scientific committee are appointed by the editor-in-chief of the journal. In doing so, the latter shall take into account proposals that may be presented by the managing editor and associate editors. The role of this second committee is fourfold: :

1. It provides scientific expertise by analyzing the needs of the field. To this end, it suggests the type of publications to be prioritized and the themes to be highlighted. In this sense, it contributes to maintaining and developing the visibility of the journal;
2. Given the high profile of its members, the Scientific Committee may be consulted by the Editor-in-Chief to define the strategic direction of the journal. This committee has an advisory role in this regard;
3. At the request of the editorial team, its members may be asked to represent the journal at various conferences and other study days organized by learned societies. The aim is to increase the journal's notoriety by making its editorial line better known in the scientific community and to increase the number of article submissions;
4. Its members are called upon in priority by the editorial committee to proofread proposed articles. They may also be called upon in cases of disagreement concerning the evaluation of a manuscript or a proposal for a special issue.

The composition of the journal's scientific committee has evolved over the last few months in line with the new editorial policy, in particular by integrating a dozen recognized specialists in the field of organizational behavior, thus reinforcing the guarantees of high-level academic assessment. The presence of English-speaking members also allows for the evaluation of article proposals that are submitted in English.
The chairman of the scientific committee is the guarantor of the scientific integrity of the journal. It acts as a mediator in the event of difficulties arising between the editorial board and the authors or reviewers.